Rare earth elements—once obscure to most outside of mining and manufacturing circles—have become the fulcrum of 21st-century geopolitics. As of mid-2025, the U.S., China, and the EU find themselves entangled in a new kind of great-power rivalry, not over ideology or territory, but over dysprosium, neodymium, and terbium.
At the center of this contest is China’s overwhelming dominance: the country accounts for around 90% of the world’s rare earth elements and nearly all processing of heavy rare earths critical for high-performance magnets. These elements are essential to electric vehicles, wind turbines, smartphones, jet fighters, and missile systems. Beijing’s grip—decades in the making—has now matured into a potent geopolitical weapon.
China’s Leverage Becomes Policy
In April 2025, China introduced export license requirements on rare earths and magnets, adding layers of bureaucracy that effectively throttled supply. Ostensibly a move to tighten oversight, the opaque, slow-moving licensing process amounted to a de facto trade curb, particularly targeting heavier rare earths where China’s dominance is nearly total.
While not a blanket ban, the move paralleled the 2010 spat with Japan when China briefly restricted exports. The global signal was unmistakable: Beijing is prepared to leverage its rare earth monopoly to retaliate against adversaries in trade and technology disputes.
Western capitals responded with alarm. For Washington and Brussels alike, it was a wake-up call—not only of strategic vulnerability but of how economic interdependence could be swiftly converted into political risk.
A Fragile Truce, Not a Resolution
By May 2025, rare earths were a headline issue in U.S.–China trade talks in Geneva. Officials announced a tentative truce: the U.S. would temper tariffs, and China would ease rare earth curbs. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer claimed Beijing pledged to lift restrictions on magnet exports.
In reality, little changed. Export licenses from Beijing trickled out slowly. By late May, Donald Trump, back in office since January, publicly accused China of violating the deal. In turn, Chinese officials rebuked U.S. semiconductor sanctions, underscoring the mutual distrust.
Yet by June, dialogue continued. A direct phone call between Trump and Xi Jinping on June 5 reopened high-level channels. Two days later, Reuters reported that China had discreetly granted six-month export licenses for rare earths to suppliers of U.S. automakers and industrial firms. While limited in scope, these approvals signaled a calibrated move: alleviate acute U.S. manufacturing pain without giving up leverage.
Europe’s Tightrope Walk
Though not directly targeted, Europe was collateral damage. By May, several EU auto parts firms began halting production due to magnet shortages. Germany’s CLEPA revealed that only about 25% of the hundreds of license applications had been granted, many rejected on procedural grounds. Mercedes-Benz and BMW scrambled to secure buffer stocks.
Diplomatically, Europe acted fast. On June 4, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič met with China’s Commerce Minister in Paris. The outcome: a pledge to create a “green channel” for European rare earth licenses. This was a small but meaningful concession from Beijing, likely motivated by the upcoming July 2025 EU–China summit celebrating 50 years of diplomatic ties.
Yet Brussels is also hardening its position. The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act mandates mining 10%, refining 40%, and recycling 25% of its own critical materials by 2030. New projects are underway in Greenland, Serbia, Malawi, and South Africa—all aimed at securing alternatives to China.
Industry Under Strain
The effects on automakers, electronics, and defense have been sharp. Ford had to suspend Explorer SUV production in May after running out of a rare-earth-containing component. Bosch and other major parts suppliers flagged delays stemming from China’s new licensing red tape.
The Pentagon, too, grew concerned. The F-35 fighter alone contains hundreds of kilograms of rare earths. China’s selective approvals—excluding firms involved in U.S. defense programs—sent a clear message: minerals can be weaponized with surgical precision.
In response, companies are hedging their bets. Tesla announced plans for a new motor design that avoids rare earths. Toyota and others are experimenting with alternate magnet chemistries. Across the board, firms are building inventories, exploring substitute suppliers, and lobbying governments for relief.
Policies of Resilience
Washington and Brussels are now investing billions to “friend-shore” critical mineral supply chains. In the U.S., the Mountain Pass mine is ramping up output, supported by over $400 million in Pentagon funding. A new processing plant in Texas—jointly developed by MP Materials and Australia’s Lynas—aims to close the supply chain loop.
Europe, facing steeper geological and economic barriers, is leaning on foreign partnerships. The EU is backing rare earth mining in Africa and Greenland and negotiating trade deals to lock in strategic access. At home, Solvay is expanding rare earth refining capacity in France, and state incentives are being considered to support uncompetitive domestic magnet manufacturing.
Both blocs are also investing in innovation, such as recycling rare earths from end-of-life electronics and developing next-generation motors with reduced or zero reliance on Chinese inputs. These transitions, however, require time and significant capital.
Outlook: Between Dependence and Diversification
This diplomatic thaw comes ahead of new high-level trade talks scheduled for June 9 in London, with delegations led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng. Although framed as “constructive,” the outcome of these discussions remains uncertain. Both sides face structural disagreements, ranging from technology controls to tariff regimes and long-term market access.
Beijing’s move to issue temporary six-month export licenses for rare earths to select U.S. firms provides immediate relief to manufacturers, but the gesture is narrowly targeted and strategically limited. As such, the détente is not yet a resolution, and trust remains fragile.
Looking ahead, two potential scenarios now loom:
• Managed De-escalation
If the June 9 talks yield durable outcomes—such as a framework for rare earth trade and clearer export protocols—the immediate panic could subside. However, any truce would likely be fragile and subject to further geopolitical flare-ups.
• Strategic Fragmentation
Should talks stall or new disputes arise, the risk of a bifurcated global mineral market increases. China could tighten licensing again, and the U.S. could respond with broader tariffs or investment controls. The outcome would be a fractured ecosystem, with parallel supply networks and increased costs.
For policymakers and industries alike, this moment represents a wake-up call. Efforts across the West—from the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act to new U.S. legislation supporting domestic mining and recycling—are aimed at reducing long-term dependence. But these efforts come with costs: higher prices, longer lead times, and geopolitical recalibration.
In short, China may have turned the taps back on, for now. But the episode has confirmed what many already suspected: rare earths are not just minerals. They are leverage. They are policy. They are power.
In today’s global economy, rare earths are not just elements—they are strategic instruments. When they stop flowing, the world pays attention.
Leave a Reply