As the global economy accelerates toward a low-carbon future, critical minerals have emerged not merely as industrial inputs—but as levers of geopolitical power. From rare earth elements and lithium to cobalt, graphite, and gallium, these once-obscure materials are now central to both national security and economic diplomacy. They underpin the world’s clean energy infrastructure, from electric vehicle batteries to wind turbines, semiconductors, and guided missile systems.
Increasingly, however, control over these minerals is being weaponised. China’s dominance in processing, America’s bid to secure non-aligned supply chains, Europe’s struggle for independence, and resource-rich nations like the DRC and Ukraine trading access for military and financial support—all point to a new reality: critical minerals have become the new missiles in a global campaign of economic warfare.
Rare Earths and the U.S.–China Minerals Cold War
Rare earth elements—17 metals vital for defense and high-tech industries—have become a sharp instrument in U.S.–China trade tensions. China, which produces over two-thirds of rare earths and processes nearly 90% of global output, has repeatedly wielded this dominance as leverage. Recent Chinese curbs on rare earth exports, in retaliation for U.S. tariffs and technology restrictions, sent a pointed signal to Western supply chains: these resources are strategic weapons.
Washington has responded with urgency. The U.S. has activated emergency legislation to support domestic mining and formed alliances like the Mineral Security Partnership with 14 countries and the EU to fund alternative supply routes. Yet, building secure non-Chinese capacity remains a long-term endeavor. In the near term, Beijing’s grip on critical minerals continues to shape global negotiations.
Ukraine’s Minerals-for-Aid Diplomacy
Amid the fog of war, Ukraine’s vast mineral reserves—spanning 22 of the 34 critical materials listed by the EU—have become a bargaining chip. Lithium, graphite, titanium, rare earths: the country’s subsoil wealth is increasingly central to its foreign relations.
In a landmark proposal in early 2025, the U.S. offered military and reconstruction aid to Ukraine in exchange for long-term rights to Ukrainian mineral revenues. While the deal has sparked geopolitical controversy, it underscores a powerful dynamic: in times of conflict, access to critical resources can be traded for national security guarantees.
Such mineral diplomacy is reshaping global alliances. If the U.S. locks in strategic access to Ukrainian minerals, Europe could find itself outmaneuvered in its search for non-Chinese supply—a stark reminder that geopolitical influence may now flow through the mineral veins of partner nations.
Europe’s Green Agenda Meets Strategic Vulnerability
Europe’s ambitious climate targets rest on fragile foundations. While the EU has taken steps to diversify its supply chains, it remains significantly reliant on Chinese processing capabilities—particularly for transition minerals like lithium, graphite, and cobalt. China currently processes over 60% of the world’s lithium, more than 90% of its battery-grade graphite, and around 73% of cobalt—consolidating its grip on materials vital to the energy transition.
When it comes to rare earth elements, China accounted for approximately 39% of the EU’s rare earth imports in 2023, followed by Malaysia and Russia, depending on the mineral segment. These figures mark a shift from earlier perceptions of near-total dependency, but still reveal a pronounced strategic vulnerability.
To address this, the EU introduced the Critical Raw Materials Act, aiming by 2030 to mine 10%, process 40%, and recycle 25% of its strategic mineral needs domestically. Projects like Solvay’s rare earth separation facility in France represent a pivotal step toward reshoring supply chains. However, the economics remain challenging: Chinese operations are 20–40% cheaper due to scale and environmental laxity, making Europe’s path to self-sufficiency long and capital-intensive.
China’s Global Strategy: Build Abroad, Squeeze at Home
China’s mineral dominance is no accident. Through decades of investment, it has secured control of global mineral supply chains. Chinese-backed firms dominate cobalt mining in the DRC, lithium in Chile and Argentina, and rare earths in Myanmar. Simultaneously, China has retained a near-monopoly on processing and refining across most critical minerals.
When disputes arise, Beijing has proven willing to deploy export controls. Curbs on gallium, germanium, and most recently rare earths have roiled markets and raised alarms in Washington and Brussels.
China’s message is clear: it controls the minerals that fuel the green economy—and it will use that power to shape geopolitical outcomes.
Africa and Emerging Markets: The 21st Century Scramble
From the DRC to Indonesia, a new resource race is unfolding. The DRC supplies nearly 70% of global cobalt, yet artisanal mining and armed groups have turned mineral wealth into a driver of conflict. In 2023–24, the M23 rebellion in eastern Congo seized territory rich in coltan and gold, reportedly backed by regional powers seeking mineral access.
In Myanmar, militias rushed to control rare earth mines amid post-coup chaos. In Chile and Bolivia, debates rage over lithium nationalization and contract renegotiations.
For many emerging markets, the green transition mirrors colonial extraction patterns. Resources leave; wealth seldom returns. While transparency initiatives and local beneficiation policies are gaining traction, the risk of a 21st-century “resource curse” remains real.
Congo’s “Minerals-for-Security” Proposal
Perhaps the most revealing development is the DRC’s 2025 offer to trade mining access for military aid. In conversations with U.S. officials, Kinshasa proposed granting American firms exclusive mineral concessions—including cobalt and copper—in exchange for intelligence and defense support against M23 rebels.
Such a “minerals-for-security” partnership marks a dramatic evolution in how natural resources are leveraged. The DRC, long dependent on Chinese investment, is now hedging toward the U.S., hoping to turn its mineral wealth into a strategic buffer. While the deal remains under negotiation, its implications are far-reaching. It exemplifies how mineral-rich states are transforming resources into diplomatic currency—shaping the global balance of power in the process.
An Industry Under Pressure—and Poised for Leadership
Demand for critical minerals is projected to skyrocket. The International Energy Agency forecasts a 40-fold increase in lithium demand by 2040, alongside exponential growth for cobalt, nickel, and rare earths. With over 125 million electric vehicles expected on the road by 2030, the strain on current supply chains will be extraordinary.
Against this backdrop, the weaponisation of minerals heightens the stakes. Governments are racing to secure stockpiles, redesign technologies, and form mineral alliances. Price spikes, export bans, and sudden policy shifts could trigger severe global disruptions.
Yet amid this volatility, firms with global reach and strategic foresight will rise as stabilizing forces.
Saptriva, with its diversified presence across energy, metals, and logistics, is uniquely positioned to serve as a trusted intermediary in this era of mineral realignment. Our ability to reroute supply, forge upstream partnerships, and adapt to shifting compliance regimes provides clients with resilience in uncertain markets.
Moreover, we are committed to investing in ethical sourcing and local value chains—partnering with mineral-rich countries to support fair extraction, responsible labor standards, and local processing capacity. In doing so, we not only mitigate risks but contribute to building a more sustainable and secure global minerals ecosystem.
Conclusion: The New Geography of Power
As the age of oil geopolitics gives way to the era of critical minerals, a new map of global influence is emerging—one defined not by pipelines, but by mineral corridors, processing hubs, and strategic partnerships.
In this landscape, minerals are not just commodities—they are statecraft, leverage, and insurance. Nations will increasingly negotiate with lithium contracts and cobalt licenses, as much as with tariffs or treaties.
For firms like Saptriva, this is not just a challenge—it is a mandate. To navigate, to stabilize, and to lead in a world where resource flows shape geopolitical futures.
Because in this new age, minerals are the new missiles—and knowledge, flexibility, and trust are the most valuable reserves.
Leave a Reply